CASE STUDY

Accessibility Initiative at Radiology Partners

Building an accessibility foundation for Radiology Partners

Role: UX Designer, Accessibility Lead
Team: Digital Experience
Timeline: 2024–Present
Scope: Accessibility auditing, WCAG compliance strategy, accessibility education, leadership presentations, project planning, cross-functional collaboration, implementation oversight, content accessibility, usability evaluation, and phased remediation planning

Concern, audit, initiative, phased implementation graphoc

How accessibility strategy became a cross-functional digital initiative at Radiology Partners

product + brand + platform evolution over time.

What began as an effort to better understand digital accessibility standards evolved into a broader initiative to improve usability, inclusivity, and digital quality across Radiology Partners’ web experiences.

The original goal was straightforward — audit and improve accessibility on radpartners.com. But as research and audits progressed, it became clear the challenge extended beyond isolated fixes. Accessibility gaps existed across design, content structure, development patterns, and internal workflows.

This project ultimately shifted from a website accessibility audit into the foundation for a scalable accessibility program — including leadership alignment, team education, governance planning, and phased WCAG implementation across the organization.

The Recognizing the Gap

While managing and supporting multiple Radiology Partners web properties, I began noticing recurring accessibility and usability issues across our digital experiences.

Examples included:

  • Low color contrast reducing readability

  • Missing or inconsistent heading structure

  • Lack of descriptive alt text

  • Keyboard navigation issues

  • Inconsistent semantic structure

  • Accessibility barriers introduced through visual components and page builder tools

As a healthcare organization, accessibility was not only a compliance consideration, but also a user experience responsibility.

The existing workflow relied heavily on visual QA and traditional marketing review processes, but accessibility standards had never been formally integrated into the organization’s digital practices.

Radpartners.com homepage screenshot with accessibility issues flagged

My Role

As the Digital Experience Designer and Accessibility expert I led:

  • Accessibility research and education

  • WCAG certification and self-education

  • Accessibility auditing and issue identification

  • Tool evaluation and implementation recommendations

  • Executive presentations and stakeholder alignment

  • Project planning and phased rollout strategy

  • Internal accessibility education and process development

  • Phase 1 implementation leadership

WCAG conformance level pyramid highlighting AAA, AA, and A level compliance

Building the Foundation

Accessibility Education & Certification

Before proposing organizational changes, I wanted to strengthen my own understanding of accessibility standards and implementation best practices.

To build that foundation, I:

  • Earned an accessibility certification

  • Studied WCAG AA and AAA standards

  • Researched accessibility workflows and implementation strategies

  • Learned how accessibility intersects with UX, content strategy, and development

  • Evaluated accessibility testing methodologies and tooling

This phase was critical in helping translate accessibility from a broad concept into actionable, scalable processes.

Selecting Accessibility Tooling

To support accessibility improvements at scale, I evaluated several auditing and monitoring tools based on usability, reporting clarity, workflow integration, and scalability.

We selected Pope Tech as our primary accessibility platform due to its:

  • Site-wide scanning capabilities

  • Clear issue reporting

  • Educational remediation guidance

  • Ease of use for both technical and non-technical teams

Pope Tech became the foundation for auditing, prioritization, progress tracking, and ongoing monitoring.

Pope tech most common issues errors dashboard
Pope tech most common issues alerts dashboard

Accessibility Audit

Auditing radpartners.com

Using Pope Tech alongside manual testing, I conducted a broad accessibility audit of radpartners.com.

The audit included:

  • Automated accessibility scans

  • Manual keyboard navigation testing

  • Semantic structure review

  • Color contrast testing

  • Content and link clarity evaluation

  • Zoom and responsiveness testing

  • ARIA and hidden content review

Key Findings

Initial scans revealed widespread accessibility opportunities across the site.

Common issues included:

  • Low color contrast

  • Missing or inconsistent heading hierarchy

  • Missing alt text

  • Generic link text

  • Keyboard navigation issues

  • Carousel usability barriers

  • Semantic structure inconsistencies

  • Responsiveness issues at 400% zoom

The audit helped identify both:

  • High-impact quick wins

  • Longer-term structural improvements

Creating a Phased Accessibility Roadmap

Rather than attempting a full redesign or complete remediation all at once, I developed a phased implementation strategy focused on balancing impact, effort, and organizational readiness.

Phase 1: Foundational Improvements

Low-effort, high-impact updates:

  • Color contrast

  • Alt text

  • Heading structure

Future Phases

Additional phases will address:

  • Link clarity and semantic improvements

  • Keyboard navigation

  • ARIA implementation

  • Carousel usability

  • Responsive and zoom behavior

  • Broader UX and component-level accessibility improvements

This phased approach helped make the initiative feel realistic, approachable, and scalable.

Defining the Strategy

screenshot of poor color contrast on hover
color contrast checking tool showing the colors failing WCAG compliance standards
screenshot showing an empty alt text box
screenshot showing the skipped heading level alert from the WACE accessibility evaluation tool

Securing Leadership Buy-In

Presenting the Opportunity

To move the initiative forward, I created and delivered an accessibility presentation for marketing leadership.

The presentation focused on:

  • What accessibility is

  • Why it matters

  • Current accessibility gaps

  • Business and user impact

  • WCAG AA vs AAA standards

  • Recommended implementation strategy

  • Phased roadmap and ownership model

The goal was not simply to highlight problems, but to demonstrate a realistic path forward.

Outcome

Leadership approved the initiative and supported moving forward with a phased accessibility improvement strategy using radpartners.com as the pilot site.

Educating the Team

Accessibility Training & Internal Enablement

Following leadership approval, I began building educational resources and implementation guides for the marketing and communications team.

This included:

  • Accessibility presentations

  • Role-specific guidance

  • Simplified WCAG explanations

  • Real world examples

The goal was to make accessibility approachable and actionable for both technical and non-technical contributors.

Implementation (Current Phase)

Phase 1 In Progress

Implementation is currently underway for:

  • Color contrast improvements

  • Alt text remediation

  • Heading structure cleanup

  • The work includes:

  • Creating reusable workflows

  • Defining accessibility QA standards

  • Tracking progress through Asana

  • Re-scanning and validating updates through Pope Tech

This phase is also serving as a pilot process that can later be expanded across additional Radiology Partners web properties.

Three versions of the same webpage showing before and after accessibility improvements are applied

Early Impact

Organizational Shift

Even in the early stages, the initiative has already created meaningful organizational momentum.

Outcomes so far include:

  • Leadership alignment and approval

  • Increased accessibility awareness across marketing

  • Introduction of accessibility into digital workflows

  • Establishment of accessibility review processes

  • Creation of scalable implementation documentation

Improved collaboration between design, content, and development stakeholders

Three versions of the same webpage showing before and after accessibility improvements are applied

Current Status

road work ahead construction signs

In Progress

This case study reflects an active, ongoing accessibility initiative.

Future updates will include:

  • Implementation outcomes

  • Before/after accessibility improvements

  • Metrics and accessibility score improvements

  • Expanded remediation phases

  • Team adoption and process evolution

  • Long-term accessibility governance strategy